Together with

Good morning 👋

When you think of Benchmark, you know what you’re getting.

The fund has kept their fund sizes and investment strategy consistent for decades, so if and when they ever change things up, we pay attention.

Their latest regulatory filings showed a new partners-only fund that is currently being raised, so we’ve spent the past couple of hours figuring out what that’s all about.

Let’s get into it.

P.S. 💰 Are you a full-time investor AND do you want to get paid more?

Today’s highlights

  • Benchmark says “no” to outside capital

  • How beehiiv grows

  • The new lane to financial freedom

  • Four areas where seeding funding is strongest

TOP
Benchmark doesn’t want LP money 🙅‍♂️

While other VC firms have raised billions and watched their AUM balloon, Benchmark is sticking to its playbook: keep it small and keep their conviction high.

The fund raised its standard $425 million fund over the summer, but there was an additional wrinkle in this fund that was different from others in the past. Behind the scenes, Benchmark is quietly raising an additional $170 million for its Founders’ Fund I- a pot primarily made up of the partners’ own cash.

This fund, as revealed in regulatory filings, is expected to funded by partners-only, with a few seats reserved for friends and family. So, what’s the real play here?

Why it matters: Benchmark’s partners have every reason to double down on their own investments. This “skin in the game” approach keeps them aligned and hungry for outsized returns - without the hassle of managing limited partners' expectations.

It also signals a growing trend in venture capital: firms are opting for alternative structures to keep more control.

Benchmark isn’t the only one doing this. Sequoia’s heritage fund and Homebrew’s decision to go LP-free point to a broader movement of VC firms wanting fewer cooks in the kitchen.

What happens next: We don’t expect many other firms to follow the same trend of raising partner-only funds without outside capital commitments.

How many funds could really do that even if they wanted to?

This really signals a few other things to us:

  1. The best firms are playing different

  2. Benchmarks’ returns must be really good

Read more about Benchmark:

Together with Wokelo
10x your diligence speed 💨

Wokelo helps you move through diligence, faster.

Their software helps you:

Instantly analyze massive datasets
Quickly uncover risks and opportunities
Gather hard-to-find info on any niche topic
Get to conviction (faster)

Stop losing out on deals because your diligence process sucks.

Hyper-accelerate your diligence with Wokelo.

HEADLINES

  • 4 Areas Where Seed Funding Is Strong, From AI Assistants To Carbon Capturers (Crunchbase)

  • How Will Self-Driving Cars Learn to Make Life-and-Death Choices? (WSJ)

  • Bezos-backed Perplexity reportedly raising $500M at $8B+ valuation (Pitchbook)

Sponsor Confluence.VC Weekly
Got a B2B biz? 📥

Join dozens of high-growth companies partnering with us to reach 15k of some of the most sought-after people in tech and finance.

  • 73% of audience makes over $100k / year

  • 65% of audience between 25-44

  • 90% of audience based in US

(Media kit available upon request)

RECS

  • Big Desk Energy: Startup insights, stories, and vibes sent to your inbox every Tuesday

  • Creator Spotlight: Your guide to building an audience with social media and newsletters with creator deep-dives every Friday.

POLL

Who has more control in fundraising markets right now?

Login or Subscribe to participate

Thanks for reading this far and giving us a little bit of your attention this week.

Feel free to unsubscribe whenever this stops becoming valuable to you.

RESULTS

Here are the results from our poll question in yesterday’s piece:

Do you expect more funds to create their own in-house emerging manager programs?

🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Yes - absolutely (6)

🟨🟨🟨⬜️⬜️⬜️ No - not a chance (3)

🟨⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️ Don't know - time will tell 🤷‍♂️ (2)

11 Votes

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Keep Reading