THE FOUNDER

Danny Chu, CEO @ Journey

Danny Chu is the CEO of Journey, a GTM product that consolidates stories into links that buyers will actually engage with.

THE COMPANY

Website

Description

One link, all your content, personalized for the person reading it

Sector

GTM Tooling

Stage

Seed

HQ

Allen, TX

THE INTERVIEW

The importance of story packaging, lessons from a PLG funnel, and why you should build for a smaller audience at first with Danny Chu (CEO @ Journey)

We live in an artificial era.

  • Fake content (AI slop, deep fakes, and Sora 2)

  • Fake knowledge (more AI slop)

  • Fake ARR numbers (booked vs. contracted vs. real)

  • Fake accolades

And an endless stream of other things that have become easier to fake.

You know what is still hard to fake? Customer testimonials.

That’s part of the reason why I love Journey and what Danny is building. You can look through what customers say, and you’ll quickly see how they feel about the product.

Here’s a masterclass from him on what he’s building, what he’s learned along the way, and how he is applying lessons from previous companies to execute …

Maybe to set the stage, can you give the quick 2–3 elevator pitch both on yourself and on Journey?

My name's Danny, CEO of Journey.io.

My background has been mainly in early stage software or SaaS sales In 2015, I started a small bootstrapped company called Note Ninja. Basically, it was, a competitor to Fathom, Gong, Chorus, all these guys that are out there. I built it for about two years, and sold it to Salesloft in 2017.

After that, about four and a half years ago, I started a company called XO Capital with two other co-founders. In a span about four and a half years, we bootstrapped to a small portfolio of 12 micro-saas companies, three of which were former YC companies. One of those Journey.

I consider Journey a horizontal tool at the moment, but what I believe it does really well is, it communicates your story conveniently and effectively to the people that you want your story told to.

Use cases include: investor deck and deal flow sharing from venture capital and private equity firms, sharing sales material (obviously), and sharing marketing material. Simply put, if you care about how your story is being received, Journey improves that part of your story.

  • Better than an email attachment.

  • Better than a link in an email or anywhere else.

  • Better than a Google folder.

  • Better than a Docsend folder.

Journey aligns and ensures that whatever it is you want to be communicating to a customer gets communicated. Prospect, investor, potential investor, guest, partner, etc. - if you care about how that stuff is delivered, Journey is the best tool to do so.

You acquired Journey after its YC run. What did you keep, what did you kill, and what thesis changed once you saw real usage and churn patterns post-deal?

What did I keep? The product.

The product is great. It isn’t heavy or clunky, it’s designed for usage; it's beautiful. It does what it's supposed to do, and it delivers value to our clients.

What did you kill? Pretty much every operational stack. When you're venture-backed, you start investing in tons and tons of tools, and these start to stack up. We killed most of it.

What these has changed? I'm not sure.

Our first attempt when we bought journey was to transition the tool to a pure kind of digital salesroom. It was initially very horizontal competing with Gamma because they both came out at the same time. But then we took it and pivoted it from more sales enablement software to a digital salesroom. We did that for about a year and around February or March of this year, we looked at 12 months of data and realized it wasn't working.

It was too big of a lift. There's too much competition to kind of carve out a niche. So we're kind of back to square one and really focusing on sort of this.

Packaging matters. How your story is delivered matters. If you're communicating something of value and that value could be a billion dollar deal opportunity, you don't want to send that information via a link or a PDF attachment for a number of reasons beyond just security.

If you're selling a $500,000 manufacturing unit and you're using Zoom to sell this machinery, you don't want to use a link. Follow up with nothing or text heavy things.

Maybe you have a 3D model. Maybe you have product demos. Maybe you have videos. You don't want to send any of that information. So we're trying to figure out kind of these characteristics where people are people care.

Whatever story or message you have gets delivered when it matters.

From my understanding, Journey primarily competes on inertia and competes against disjointed Notion pages and bloated digital sales rooms. Compared to the status quo, where do you guys win, and where do you still lose today?

We still lose today mainly because this is.

You see a lot of tools out there where the solution is positioned as the the prep. The presentation killer. The Google Slides killer.

Our opinion is that nobody is going to kill Google Slides. It is very, very hard to change behavior - that's what I've learned.

Probably one of the famous ones is getting people out of email and into Slack, right? That was a huge change in behavior. But they were able to do it for a variety of reasons.

But one-in-a-million tools fundamentally changes how people work. We don’t like those odds.

The main objection we are competing against is the question of “why should I put my Google Slides in a Journey?” Here’s how we think about answering that question:

  • When you send via Google Slides, are you not sending with the intention of the recipient to book a call with you?

  • So when they click into your Google Slides and they read it and they go through it, are they actually digesting that information and acting on it in the way you want?

  • So if you have a demo or CTA link in your Google Slides and it's not in presentation mode, the prospect has to copy and paste and put it into a new tab to book a call.

  • All of that is friction.

  • All of that tells your prospect “I don't care as much about you as you think, because I'm making you do all of these things as a next step.”

  • Versus in a Journey, you have the Google Slides in the same view, and you scroll down, and you have a iframe. Of your accountability link that's easily clickable, you can navigate back and forth across information.

And that means something, especially if whatever it is that you're delivering matters to you. It matters to your prospect or customer, whomever it is that you're talking.

What’s the real “aha” moment inside a Journey (first share, first multi-stakeholder view, or the first time a buyer forwards it internally)? How did you instrument and validate that?

The first really cool experience from the customer side inside of Journey is when you deliver your value story. From the client side, it’s whenever they receive their first Journey.

The feedback we’ve gotten from customers who love the product is “I can actually see what my clients are doing in here and I can provide them a better experience because I know what's important to them”.

The other really big shift that I'm trying to focus on is building for the B2B buyer journey.

I think the statistic is like 75 - 80% of a decision making process in the B2B world is done before they talk to a salesperson.

That's very different than what I'm used to.

I used to hop on three or four demos a week trying to learn what software is interesting to me and I don't mind hearing that pitch. Nowadays, information gathering, asking your community, looking on LinkedIn, doing your own Google searches, doing ChatGPT searches, all these things, free trials, other free tools to figure out what's right and what's not.

Those touch points don't have as much control over as a physical synchronous conversation, and that's where I think something like Journey helps is that it communicates your story in a personal authentic way. A better than the alternative.

And I think, again, nowadays, that matters a lot more, especially if you want to be able to see and track how those things are assets are being interacted with in the wild.

All of those touch points are important because if any of those things falter in communicating your value correctly, there's a chance that you may never ever talk to that person again because they're making that decision (or at least 80% of that decision) before they ever want to talk to you or anyone on your team.

What are some experiments you are running / have been running to acquire new customers? What have been your biggest takeaways from the experiments you have run up until this point?

  • We've done Product Hunt launches.

  • I've been trying to focus a lot and some founder-led stuff on LinkedIn and other more personal content stuff.

  • The big thing and the big experiment was getting rid of the free version and switching to a free trial. And a lot of that is because because the tool is horizontal, we’re struggling.

I've had really poor experiences selling horizontal software. As a former enterprise salesperson, I can sell something that's very niche. But when the use cases are infinite, the people I'm talking to are infinite, it's very hard.

That's why for Notion and all these big players, it took them awhile to figure that out. It needs to start small, and that’s where I’m at right now.

Walk me through the PLG funnel: templates → free trial → Start/Grow/Scale. How do you measure success for each part of that funnel?

I don't really have a lot to say there other than we're figuring it out because it didn't work in the beginning.

We saw a lot of people using journey for one purpose. After doing interviews, I learned that our best customers, they use Journey everywhere. They've sort of made a commitment to say, yes - how things are shared, presented, received, regardless of where it is - that is important to me and my business, and I believe Journey is the best mechanism.

Some customers are saying “I have a job posting where I used to have three or four links to case studies or Notion pages. Now I have it all in one single Journey.” That’s one example.

Another could be “I have actually ads everywhere, and it used to go to this HubSpot landing page that I created. But now it actually goes to a Journey.”

Or another could be “I build lead magnets in Gamma, in a Notion page, or in a Google Doc, and I gate keep it. Now I have that in Journey.”

So you can see the use cases vary, but we’ve made an effort to take in data based on how customers are using the product, and apply that to building public-facing resources that reduce friction for the next cohort of customers.

What is one from building Journey that might not be too obvious to other founders and operators?

Sometimes - especially very early on - you have to always question everything.

Not only the decisions that you made, but the initial reason why you made that decision. Your job as a founder is to allocate resources towards what’s working and away from what isn't working.

I think at an early stage, it's also very important to question why you decided to take those actions.

Fundamentally, sometimes you need to take a step back and say, “Hey, is the reason why I decided to take any and all of these actions right?” Because this idea of finding product market fit - it's a very fundamental thing. And I think sometimes we ask questions just at the surface instead of going deeper to find the answer at the root.

What is your advice to other founders building in GTM tooling?

Don't! (I'm just kidding.)

Be very, very narrow.

Take Tibo for example. He built Tweet Hunter, Outrank, and several other tools. He was very popular on LinkedIn and I think he sold his Tweet Hunter to Lemlist or Lempire. His newsletter the other day talked about something that stuck with me

In his case, for anything he built, he built for a very, very, very small group of people. Like, actual people, instead of an audience or an ICP or a set of characteristics. He builds for a group of roughly 10 people. And then from there, if it works or if they see value, he grows it from there.

That would be my advice. Because sales tools are so competitive, so much noise, so many use cases, so many competitors are already built. I think to find success, you kind of need to start very narrow and focused.

P.S. Use code ‘JOURNEYSPECIAL25’ to get 25% off.

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Keep Reading