Say “hey” 👋 | Apply 👥 | Upgrade 📶 | Sponsor 📣

Good morning 👋

I’ve been deep in the weeds working on a project that I’ll (hopefully) be sharing more soon.

I’ve got nothing witty to say, so let’s get right into the biggest stories since last Friday.

P.S. 💰 Are you a full-time investor AND do you want to get paid more?

Today’s highlights

  • General Catalyst gets creative

  • How the world will change according to Paul Graham

  • How to get ahead of the 99%

  • The most-promising creator companies of 2024

TOP
General Catalyst and the death of traditional venture

Source

General Catalyst is signaling the end of traditional venture investing with a new model that looks nothing like the old VC playbook.

Instead of focusing solely on early-stage equity investments, General Catalyst is rolling out revenue-based financing for companies with heavy marketing and customer acquisition costs, taking a share of future income rather than pure equity stakes.

With $30 billion in assets under management and $8 billion in fresh capital, the firm has also acqui-hired smaller VCs over the past few years, and it is even buying a healthcare system in Ohio.

It’s a shift being echoed by other major players, like Andreessen Horowitz, as the lines between venture capital and broader asset management continue to blur.

Why it matters: The classic venture model is dying off, and funds are becoming creative with how they create equity value.

We’re seeing it with seed funds becoming more nuanced in order to gain an edge and win deals.

We’re seeing it with growth funds that are building out service components of their own business in order to support the companies they work with.

And we’re seeing it with mega funds that are registering as RIAs, changing financing structures, acquiring other funds and talent, and buying up assets for distribution purposes.

What happens next: We should write a much longer piece on this (note to self), but this is the latest reminder that traditional venture is over, and a modern approach has taken over.

There are way to many funds fighting over way too little truly great companies. If you’re a top 1% founder, you can take money from whoever you want, and the best firms will keep building products, services, and different offerings for those founders.

Expect more funds to find creative ways to do the core components of an investment firm (find, win, support).

Sponsor Confluence.VC Weekly
Want to put your company in front of this audience? 📥

Join dozens of high-growth companies partnering with us to reach 15k of some of the most sought-after people in tech and finance.

  • 73% of audience makes over $100k / year

  • 65% of audience between 25-44

  • 90% of audience based in US

(Media kit available upon request)

HEADLINES
What else we’re reading

  • Market Map: Digital care and treatments stabilize digital health’s vitals (Pitchbook)

  • VC megadeals are booming — and AI is surprisingly not the top category (TechCrunch)

  • Investing In The Next Frontier Of Aerospace And Defense Startups (Crunchbase)

  • 2024’s Most Promising Creator Startups (The Information)

RECS

  • Superpower: The most-useful health membership I use with 100 lab tests, health dashboard, a full hour review with their medical team (skip the waitlist and get 25% off here)

  • beehiiv: Hands-down the best piece of software we use + how we’re able to run a media-first business (get a 30-day free trial + 20% off here)

  • Clay: I haven’t found a better prospecting tool (and their name is sick)

Thanks for reading this far and giving us a little bit of your attention this week.

Feel free to unsubscribe whenever this stops becoming valuable to you.

RESULTS

Here are the results from our poll question in yesterday’s piece:

Do you do any proactive work to improve your health / prevent disease / live longer?

🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Yes - absolutely (5)

🟨🟨⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️ No - but I should 🤔 (2)

🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 No - I'm fine 🙂 (5)

12 Votes

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Keep Reading